Search for: "State v. Straw" Results 521 - 540 of 625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
A few weeks back, I posted a long blog post about Elena Kagan's scholarship and what it suggests about her views on Citizens United and the constitutionality of standard media regulation. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:58 pm by David Doniger
The EPA rules announced today are the next step forward in carrying out the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 decision, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
For example, in Chester, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2923, a prisoner claimed that his rights had been breached as prisoners in the UK are barred from voting in elections. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Jeff Gamso
*********On Tuesday, as you know, in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Lyle Denniston
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm by Andrew J. Batog
”[7] Indeed it is true that the extension of universal jurisdiction to piracy, according to Professor Dunoff, “had little to do with human dignity at all; rather, states sought to punish pirates as individuals because they were not (by definition) the agents of any states. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
United States and Barber v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Jack Straw has subsequently stated that he is “hopeful” that the legislation would be saved in a vote next Tuesday. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by charonqc
” Interestingly, the Times states: “Critics of Straw’s amendment say it would seriously undermine freedom of information laws. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
  Per the Assistant United States Attorney, the range of loss was between $2,500,000.00 and $7,000,000.00. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
In a statement issued by Justice Secretary Jack Straw, the Government has set out its decision on pleural plaques. [read post]