Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Flake, Interactive Religious Accommodations, 71 Alabama Law Review 67-114 (2019).Robin Fretwell Wilson, Common Ground Lawmaking: Lessons for Peaceful Coexistence from Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Utah Compromise, 51 Connecticut Law Review 483-574 (2019).Kermit V. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
Developmental Services of Sullivan County, 149 N.H. 264, 271 (2003). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 7:32 pm
Judge Griffith had the opinion for the court in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:41 pm
American Fed'n of State, County, and Mun. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:32 am
Then, in Gertz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
Sullivan recognized that knowing or reckless falsehoods can be punished; but Garrison v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
From A.G. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe… [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am
We also agree with the Supreme Court’s determination denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was based upon CPLR 3211(a)(3) to dismiss the fourth cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant for lack of standing (see General Obligations Law § 13-101; Greevy v Becker, Isserlis, Sullivan & Kurtz, 240 AD2d 539, 541). [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the fifth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:10 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm
Sullivan (Neb. 1997). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Sullivan (1964) Snyder v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 9:52 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Sullivan, Esq. [read post]
