Search for: "State v. Superior Court" Results 521 - 540 of 12,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 9:20 am
Scott v Superior Court states at page 544 "There can be only two parents, not three. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 11:46 am
In addition, we reiterate that a judge of the superior court generally may not overturn the order of another judge unless the record shows the other judge is unavailable.And on the federal side of things, today's DJ has H&L's John Querio and Lacey Estudillo discussion of BP PLC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
At the same time, well, you know, sometimes, statutes are ambiguous, and we punish you anyway if you violate what the courts subsequently say is the superior reading of the statute. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:38 am
The tribunal has one superior court judge, an attorney, and a Massachusetts-licensed healthcare provider. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to Superior Court’s Opinion in this Shinal case, the trial court had endeavored to implement what the trial court perceived to the principles enunciated in the case of Cordes v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
On June 13, 2012, the California Supreme Court unanimously denied review in the case of California Society of Anesthesiologists v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm by Kerry Shapiro
On December 18, 2020, the Sacramento County Superior Court prohibited the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”) from implementing California’s new wetlands and “waters of the state” protection program, and limited SWRCB’s application of the regulatory program to only waters already protected under the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:22 pm by Norm Pattis
Snipers will prowl the roof of the New Haven Superior Court this morning just as they have on other occasions when Steven Hayes appeared there. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 1:17 pm
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic Vicinage, (DeLuccia, J.S.C.) recently interpreted a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) pertaining to discipline in the case of Whitaker v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:09 pm by Staff
(Maricopa County Superior Court No. 0200160CR): Mr. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Central District of California has denied Playtex’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin rival diaper-pail producer, Munchkin, from advertising claims of a superior diaper pail. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:07 am by Howard Friedman
On September 23, 2022, the Pima County Superior Court granted the Attorney General’s motion solely based on the decision in Dobbs overruling Roe v. [read post]