Search for: "State v. Trader" Results 521 - 540 of 862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2012, 12:36 pm by Eric
The trader also loses his bid to litigate pseudonymously, but the court specifies a protective order. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:16 pm
You could apply for an H-1B nonimmigrant visa; an L1, Intra-Company Transferee visa; possibly an E1, Treaty Trader visa or an E2, Treaty Investor visa, an E3 Australian visa, or a TN visa, etc. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm by Ailyn Cabico
  These advisers should submit a state Form ADV to the relevant state by March 20, 2012 to allow at least 90 days for state approval (California in particular). (2) State-registered Investment Adviser switching to SEC registration. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
International Union of Operating Engineers, Stationary Engineers Local 39 Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:51 pm by Hanibal Goitom
It declared [[t]he state of] Liberty is in accord with the law of reason, for all men share liberty on the basis of natural law. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
Today the General Court held otherwise after a successful appeal by Tilda from the Board of Appeal decision: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd v OHIM (T304/09). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:56 am by Doug Cornelius
This was a technique not often seen in insider trading cases. 1:09-cr-01222-RJS USA v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
But in that event I can see no objection to any trader being entitled to use the description. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm by Lindsey Williams
Eaglesham and Siconolfi also reported that “the bank’s [BNY] foreign-exchange traders grew concerned about a leaker” and in an earlier WSJ article, entitled “Secret Informant Surfaces in BNY Currency Probe”, reporter Carrick Mollenkamp stated “BNY Mellon sought to discover the insider’s identity and to fight the lawsuits. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and  some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]