Search for: "State v. Williams "
Results 521 - 540
of 8,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s majority opinion once again cites Germaine for the proposition that “[t]he Constitution for purposes of appointment . . . divides all its officers [of the United States] into two classes. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:54 am
Williams, a shareholder at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:03 am
However, a staff report prepared for the Williams County Board of County Commissioners stated Sorenson had been out of compliance for operating a trucking oilfield business on the property without the County’s permission. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:34 pm
In People v Williams, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:00 pm
In Ray v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
On March 4, 2013, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, in the matter of Foley v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:00 am
” Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
Williams is remarkably similar to a Second Circuit case I teach in Criminal Procedure, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
In People v Williams, defendant pled guilty to two counts of armed robbery. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:41 pm
On June 23, 2011, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
_______________________________________________________[1] American Cyanamid Co v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Vestal, Religious State Constitution Preambles, 123 Pennsylvania State Law Review 151-190 (2018). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:37 am
Electronic Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:52 am
AC33894 - State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am
The District Court held that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:34 pm
Williams, Brigham Young University, June 5, 2013, 28 BYU Journal of Public Law (April 2014, Forthcoming) Abstract: “Do you really think that after a jury has found someone guilty, and dismissed someone from the military for sexual assault, that one person [the commander], over the advice of their legal counselor, should be able to say, ‘Never mind’? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:23 am
As Justice Felix Frankfurter famously noted in his dissent in Baker v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]