Search for: "State v. Wines"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
I'm in Austin, TX, for the next couple of days.My Aunt Gail died late last week after a protracted fight with cancer, so the extended family is here to both commiserate and celebrate - last night we drank some wine, ate some pasta, and did lots of hugging.Today we'll attend services, probably shed some tears, and then drink more wine, eat more pasta, and do more hugging.It's all so Italian...In between the family activities I'll be meeting with some Texas… [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 4:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Regan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:45 am
” Alvi’s Drift Wine International v. von Stiehl Winery, Cancellation No. 92058100 (September 12, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Cf. 4thcircuit’s AOL v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
In the recent case of Joel Gott Wines, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:06 am
” See Empire Wine & Spirits LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:18 am
We fund luxury boxes at the Air Canada Centre for Leafs games, expensive wines, and first class travel for corporate execs, and yet the public doesn’t get to see a breakdown of those costs. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
" Another entry, entitled “boob wine stoppers," included the same photo as the first entry, and stated: "These are crazy boob party girl wine stoppers...they made me buy Naughty Girl wine. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 4:02 am
The Tito’s lawsuit (Hoffman v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Recently, a Portuguese wine company, Wine Vision Lda. sought to register the mark “NOPA” in standard characters for “wines” through the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 6:42 am
The CLE program is scheduled to run from 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM and will cover several basic topics: federal regulation, state regulation, and the dormant commerce clause in relation to the 21st Amendment (Granholm v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:06 am
In addition, the court found that determining whether a plaintiff was subject to the FLSA exemption would require individualized, rather than representative, proof (Stevens v HMSHost Corp, August 26, 2014, Glasser, I). [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
Yesterday’s order of forfeiture in the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
This post discussed Sawaf v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:54 pm
The Supreme Court of Tennessee held in Fannon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
