Search for: "Strickland"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
We decline to rule that Strickland requires an appellate attorney to read advance sheets and consider newly-decided cases in the weeks or months after a direct appeal is fully briefed, argued, and submitted for decision. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:13 am
Navigation maps that show movement as cars travel would still be allowed, as would the input of preset destinations, Strickland said. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Strickland v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:54 pm
While the imposition of such standards may be highly salutary, it is not under Strickland appropriate as an exercise in Sixth Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Family Law: Support Guidelines Strickland v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:24 pm
" For each of Travillion’s two claims, the Third Circuit applied the two-prong Strickland test for deficiency and prejudice, examining prejudice first. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:06 am
The black boxes “provide critical safety information that might not otherwise be available to NHTSA to evaluate what happened during a crash — and what future steps could be taken to save lives and prevent injuries,” David Strickland, the safety agency’s administrator, said in a statement. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:59 pm
Even if the Court were to find that plea counsel was deficient, vacatur on ineffective assistance of counsel grounds would still not be warranted unless defendant were able to satisfy Strickland's second prong by "affirmatively proving" prejudice. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:55 pm
In Strickland, the Supreme Court set forth a two-part test for assessing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:50 pm
Addressing the first prong of the Strickland test, the Court finds that the defendant failed to establish that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
At its Conference on June 12, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the justiciability of claims against a private battlefield support contractor in an active war zone, equitable tolling under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and a court’s authority to order a foreign sovereign to pay defaulted debt. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:21 am
The SEC also charged the alleged insider, Thomas Bradley Strickland, and Obus’s co-worker, Peter Black. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:03 am
In California’s 25th Congressional district open primary, state senator Steve Knight finished a close second to fellow Republican Tony Strickland, and thus will advance to the general election in November. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Chatman, 13-8725, which asked whether Georgia’s Supreme Court improperly revisited the performance prong of Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:00 am
Stephanie Strickland filed the lawsuit in St. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Thompson, and encompasses both cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default of a habeas claim; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit improperly removed the prejudice prong from an analysis of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel as provided in Martinez and Strickland v. [read post]
