Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2019, 4:16 pm
The court must allow the plaintiffs' challenge to go forward. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:12 am
Combine the two and blogging about the law is a downright ... well, you get our drift.As in: We've each written books, and law review articles, and supreme court briefs. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 2:41 am
That is my condensation and paraphrase of the United State Supreme Court's decision in Troxel v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:26 pm
From Georgia's Macon Telegraph, "Several new Georgia laws take effect today," by AP's Errin Haines. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
In the New Jersey case, a lawyer was accused of violating the state Supreme Court's rules prohibiting "conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation," for displaying the seal of the New Jersey Board on Attorney Certification, even though the attorney had not been certified. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 8:27 pm
I wouldn't be surprised if this does get to the Supreme Court within a number of years. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 6:25 pm
Supreme Court, which voted 5-4 to uphold the constitutionality of the program. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:35 am
"[T]he people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Both lawyers relied heavily on the analysis in the Supreme Court's 2005 Roper v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
In that case, the District Court repeatedly cited the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Clapper v Amnesty in ruling to dismiss Wikimedia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 2:33 am
Supreme Court recently ruled that governments can fire employees if their speech harmed the workplace's mission and function.Prudence and discretion are not necessarily bad things. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 8:33 pm
Tarunabh's recent post about the Broadcast Regulation Bill is quite an exception. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:06 pm
Supreme Court.Until a final decision is handed down from the nation's high court, individual municipalities could face expensive litigation, he said.The attorney's wary approach was echoed by Pewaukee police Capt. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:28 am
There's a reason. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
The government's dangerous “special needs” argument, which apparently the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review adopted with regard to the targeted surveillance objected to by Yahoo! [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:50 pm
Palmer, who is Professionalism Counsel for the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. [read post]
