Search for: "Sweep v. Sweep"
Results 521 - 540
of 5,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
And that’s leaving aside the FTC’s recent and problematic proposal to issue sweeping regulations for digital privacy, as well. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:40 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:40 am
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
In a previous post, I described the political landscape for this year’s Section 702 reauthorization debate and noted the view of most observers that Section 702 is unlikely to be reauthorized this year without significant reforms. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
These sweeping doctrines of judicial authority, coupled with intense controversy over certain substantive decisions of the Israeli Supreme Court – notably concerning the exemption of the ultra-orthodox from military service, the West Bank settlements, and the protection of Palestinian rights – led to right-wing backlash. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Cairns v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:02 am
The Second Circuit denied a request by the whistleblower for rehearing en banc (Doe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 11:34 am
Tuition Org. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
ShareTuesday’s argument in Lora v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
And when the homeowner made a motion for summary judgment (seeking pre-trial relief in his favor), the Nassau County Supreme Court granted that dismissal request.Since the mat wasn’t a “dangerous or defective condition,” and the homeowner was able to show that it maintained the property in “reasonably safe condition,” and because A.V. wasn’t able to competently rebut those contentions, the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the underlying dismissal.No… [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
To that end, "state colleges and universities are not enclaves immune from the sweep of the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:20 am
On Monday, in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
Sackett v. [read post]
