Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR"
Results 521 - 540
of 4,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 4:35 pm
Do Denim v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 7:01 am
In Attal v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:22 am
In April the Second Department held that it is constitutional to apply the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168 et seq.) to persons convicted of certain nonsexual abduction-related crimes (People v Taylor, 42 AD2d 13 [2007], appeal dismissed 9 NY3d 887 [2007]) (See My Post of April 18, 2007). [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm
Administrative law — Zoning violation notice — Arbitrary and capricious … Samuel Taylor Coleridge, in his poem Kubla Khan, shared his conception of a mythical pleasure-dome. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:02 pm
In Demanche v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:49 am
Chuckie Taylor. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:15 am
This would be similar to LaRussa v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:32 pm
Where such changes are desired, they are subject to the collective bargaining process set out in the Taylor Law. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:38 am
TAYLOR ENERGY V. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:24 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
In the published case of Rafanello v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
In the published case of Rafanello v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 9:12 am
By Eric Goldman Capriotti's Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:25 pm
In the heart of the opinion, the Federal Circuit rejected an approach to permissive joinder that finds its roots in MyMail, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 3:17 pm
The principle is illustrated by a British Columbia Supreme Court decision earlier this year.In Chung v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:50 pm
Taylor Family Holdings, Inc., C.A. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:24 am
That's a crush.In 2014, a Ninth Circuit panel issues an opinion that grants habeas relief. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:53 am
I'll be surprised if this one survives.Yes, it's strange. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:46 pm
It makes total sense to certify this question to the Washington Supreme Court. [read post]