Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 521 - 540
of 35,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
READ MORE Pennsylvania Court Operations Restored After Cyber Attack The Pennsylvania court online operations have returned to normal following a disruptive cyber attack. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Given that the Supreme Court has also cautioned not to read its decisions as if they were statutes, it’s arguable that use for political speech should fall into the noncommercial use exception, which courts have generally read as covering “noncommercial speech” as that’s defined by the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:06 pm
The Supreme Court has consistently upheld this general principle of editorial freedom in a variety of speech contexts. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
Supreme Court defined a speedy trial as essentially a balancing act where the conduct of both the prosecution and the defendant are contemplated. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Supreme Court’s emerging “major questions” doctrine, and likely will also be affected by the Court’s forthcoming decisions in Loper Bright and Relentless. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
California Air Resources Board: Complaint Posted by Anna Restuccia (Harvard Law School), on Thursday, February 22, 2024 Tags: California, carbon emissions, Clean Air Act, Climate change, Climate Disclosure, First Amendment, GHG, GHG Disclosure, SB253, SB261 [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
California Air Resources Board: Complaint Posted by Anna Restuccia (Harvard Law School), on Thursday, February 22, 2024 Tags: California, carbon emissions, Clean Air Act, Climate change, Climate Disclosure, First Amendment, GHG, GHG Disclosure, SB253, SB261 [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
And the Supreme Court blocked it. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
California – L.A. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 1:21 pm
On February 20, 2024, the CalChamber petitioned the California Supreme Court for review of the case. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:49 am
Uber Technologies California Supreme Court ruling, a departure from the previous U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
[New York Times] * Biden administration relieves more debt officially continuing the most successful Supreme Court loss ever. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In another year, that provision alone could have generated major litigation leading to Supreme Court review. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:09 am
The following is a guest post from Andrew Albright: In Citizens United, as we all know, the Supreme Court held that independent expenditures (IEs) cannot be a source of quid pro quo corruption so long as the persons or entities publishing the IEs… Continue reading The post Andrew Albright: “Opportunities for IE Reform in California Law in a Post-Citizens United World” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
The bill specifically provides that California’s noncompete restrictions trump other states’ laws when an employee seeks employment in California, even if the employee had signed the noncompete while living outside of California and working for a non-California employer. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
After Texas officials refused a federal request to remove the barriers and a lower federal court enjoined federal officials from removing the razor wire, the Supreme Court dissolved the injunction, without explanation. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:04 pm
“Supreme Court turns down challenge to N.Y. rent control with implications for California”: David G. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 10:58 am
Supreme Court cases upholding sentences imposed under California’s three strikes law), if the judges spent 20 seconds on these cases, that was a lot. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:06 pm
Supreme Court ruling over California’s Proposition 12. [read post]
