Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION" Results 521 - 540 of 23,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2022, 2:47 pm by Keith E. Whittington
The post Bad Day in Court for the Administrative State appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
In Arthrex , the Federal Circuit held that the statutory scheme governing administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 pm by Patent Docs
Smith & Nephew, Inc., in which the court of appeals held how administrative patent judges were appointed to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution (Art. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
In Arthrex , the Federal Circuit held that the statutory scheme governing administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
In Arthrex , the Federal Circuit held that the statutory scheme governing administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
In Arthrex , the Federal Circuit held that the statutory scheme governing administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
In Arthrex , the Federal Circuit held that the statutory scheme governing administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
In Arthrex , the Federal Circuit held that the statutory scheme governing administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In so doing, it held the trial court erred in finding (1) that fees incurred in administrative proceedings were not recoverable under the statute, and (2) that a nonpecuniary “personal stake” of petitioner in the outcome of the litigation could preclude a fee recovery. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:08 am by Mark Tabakman
  In that case, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the trial court which had allowed the raising of the defense very late in the case. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm by Shea Denning
The corresponding Administrative Office of the Courts form, AOC-CR-901M, is designed only for use by a superior court judge. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The Federal Circuit agreed with the lower court that Odyssey’s challenges to the USPTO’s rules and procedures governing ex parte appeals at the Patent Trial... [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:02 am by Christopher P. Hahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently vacated a trial court order denying certification of a class of similarly situated owners of allegedly defective refrigerators for claims against its manufacturer. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 8:19 am by Doug Cornelius
“When the SEC seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial. [read post]
Keon held that these claims did not hold enough merit to impair Zuma’s right to a fair trial–a stance affirmed by the Constitutional Court. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 6:34 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
  The #4 Civil Division publishes both the request for instructions as well as their response, while the SPC Administrative Division (in their publication Administrative Law Enforcement and Administrative Adjudication (行政执法与行政审判) (pictured below) only publishes their responses to the lower courts. [read post]
8 May 2010, 1:05 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that when the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit asserts both asbestos-related and non-asbestos-related claims in the same tort action, the non-asbestos claims may be severed and proceed to trial immediately even though the asbestos-related claims are administratively dismissed under R.C. 2307.93. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:40 am by Mark Astarita
After all, it is going to be tough to lose a trial if you get to write the complaint, pay the prosecutor, try it before a judge that you appointed and pay, and then you get to decide the appeal. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:23 am by Matthew Reisig
A plea cutoff form as promulgated by the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), which is signed by the given county prosecutor’s officer or Attorney General, the defense attorney, the criminal part judge, and the defendant him/herself. [read post]