Search for: "The E Company, an Illinois corporation" Results 521 - 540 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment on patent exhaustion and implied licence granted in part ExperExchange Inc v DocuLex Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Defence verdict in patent case in Marshall (and trial stats so far for 2009): Fiber Systems v Applied Optical (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Honeywell – ITC to review initial determination in investigation of import… [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Maharaja Appliances (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court rules on section 8 and 47 of the Patents Act: Lack of disclosure under s8 = no interim injunction: Chemtura Corporation v Union of India & Ors (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Copyright access for the disabled and collaborative IP policy (Spicy IP) Bumpy road ahead – Indian government eases norms in tech transfer from overseas firms (Spicy IP)   Israel Judicial Review Officer rejects request for summary dismissal and clarifies requirements… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(Michael Geist) China Beijing Number One Intermediate People’s Court rules Microsoft violates Chinese companies IP rights in case over fonts (China Hearsay) (China Law Blog) (PC World) China domain name scams. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm by Steven Taber
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Wednesday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@calairlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm
In reaching that conclusion, the court identified four factors that should be considered in determining whether an employee has an expectation of privacy in email communications: Does the corporation maintain a policy banning personal or objectionable use; Does the corporation monitor the use of the employee’s computer or e-mail; Do third parties have a right of access to the computer or e-mails; and Did the corporation notify the employee… [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
In reaching that conclusion, the court identified four factors that should be considered in determining whether an employee has an expectation of privacy in email communications: Does the corporation maintain a policy banning personal or objectionable use; Does the corporation monitor the use of the employee's computer or e-mail; Do third parties have a right of access to the computer or e-mails; and Did the corporation notify the employee or was the… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Court not required to review products during claim construction: SP Techs. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Court not required to review products during claim construction: SP Techs. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:33 am
I recently started writing a column for the Southeast Texas Record, and its sister publications the West Virginia Record and the Madison (Illinois) Record. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
  If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
Need to establish your company's credibility with the government? [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
The company distribute electricity to approximately 5.4 million customers in Illinois (ComEd) and Pennsylvania (PECO), and gas to 485,000 customers in the Philadelphia area (PECO). [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:37 am
     The D'Oench, Duhme Backstory: D'Oench, Duhme & Company, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Castro v Cartwright (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(e)(2) refusal of PROFUMO DE FIRENZE for perfume, finding double entendre: In re Atelier Profumo Artistico Firenze SrL (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms failure-to-function refusal of STRENGTH IN DATA for brochures: In re ImClone Systems Incorporated (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) r [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(patents4life) (IPKat) Michael Punke nominates as WTO Ambassador (Intellectual Property Watch) Disney acquires Marvel – IP contention ensues (Copyfight) (IP finance)   US Patent Reform Mike Drummon, Editor-in-Chief of Inventors Digest Magazine, joins innovators for patent reform (IP Watchdog)   US Patents Litigation rumours surface over Intellectual Ventures - Picture Frame Innovations, LLC v Eastman Kodak Company et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM)… [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, Apex Oil Company appeals from the grant of an injunction, at the behest of U.S. [read post]