Search for: "The New England Divisions Case" Results 521 - 540 of 852
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 5:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Case Background The plaintiff wife and the defendant husband were married in 1966 in England. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 6:32 pm by Mark Summerfield
  How this can come about – and the fact that it is not merely some hypothetical concern of overly-conservative practitioners – is amply demonstrated by a recent case decided in the Queen’s Bench Division of the England and Wales High Court: Ford & Warren v Warring-Davies [2012] EWHC 3523 (QB) (12 December 2012).Read more » [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
 The two words were brought together in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in Population Diagnostics Inc v The Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2012] EWHC 3541 (Ch), a decision from last Thursday by Mr Justice Warren in an appeal against the refusal of Mrs Chalmers, on behalf of the UK's Intellectual Property Office, to grant two somewhat curious patent applications. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 9:09 am by Rosa Schechter
” Manny Mencía, senior vice president of Enterprise Florida’s International Trade Division, said, “A major goal of these missions is to help increase our state’s exports, which leads to more jobs, by paving the way to greater sales opportunities for Florida companies. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 10:36 am by Kelly Buchanan
Marriage bureau (Bain News Service, undated) (Source: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
This occurred earlier today in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, where Mr Justice Arnold gave his ruling in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2012] EWHC 3345 (Ch). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Justice Tugendhat of the England and Wales High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) in  Adelson & Anor v Anderson & Anor [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB) (07 October 2011) neatly summarizes the differing approaches to freedom of speech and right to reputation (including public figures) in the US and England as follows: 73. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
WELCOME to this week's Family Lore News Update.NEWSBoy brings legal test case over decision to put him in careA 15-year-old boy denied the chance to give evidence to a legal hearing about whether he should stay with his mother or be taken into care has launched a Court of Appeal test case. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
WELCOME to this week's Family Lore News Update.NEWSStandard Directions in Hague Convention Cases involving Cafcass High Court TeamThe acting President of the Family Division, the Hon Mr Justice Holman, has issued guidance on standard directions in Hague Convention cases involving the Cafcass High Court Team. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am by Stephanie Woods, Olswang LLP
In New Cap the issue was whether a default judgment of the New South Wales Supreme Court, Equity Division for unfair preferences was enforceable under the Foreign Judgements (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:09 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In the same motion, Carney argued that Bulger was granted immunity to commit crimes by the late Jeremiah O’Sullivan, a former federal prosecutor who led the New England Organized Crime Strike Force before being appointed interim US attorney in Boston in 1989. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:10 am by David J. DePaolo
New England Compounding Center has recalled all of its products. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:57 pm
The suspected bad batches were manufactured by the New England Compounding Center in Massachusetts. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
 John Baldwin QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division, England and Wales, refused the injunction and ordered that the infringement proceedings be stayed. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
 John Baldwin QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division, England and Wales, refused the injunction and ordered that the infringement proceedings be stayed. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
Additionally, it says, the case “has been complicated due to sensitive evidence relating to the police operation“. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
For more discussion, see “Ex-employees’ work for competitor OK, Inevitable disclosure doctrine inapplicable,” in New England In-House. [read post]