Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bruce" Results 521 - 540 of 932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Bruce, Cornell Law School; Edward W. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
First, Bruce Ackerman's work on constitutional history suggested the availability of "left originalism" that maintained the commitment to the constitutional will of "We the People" but argued that the constitution included a New Deal constitutional moment that legitimated the legacy of the Warren Court--We the People: Foundations, published in 1991. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
  The reason for this can be summed up in two words, "Ben" and "Popken," the man who saved more consumers from misery than anyone else on the interwebz.Via Bruce Carton at Legal Blog Watch, I learned that Ben is leaving the Consumerist, which has been on my blogroll for years, because, as it turns out, he hates people. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The judge in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case has asked if Brittany Higgins should be recalled to give evidence over alleged ‘false representations’ in her $2.4m compensation payout. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
They could point out to such people that they might well win under Britain’s libel laws and say, “So bring an action. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:27 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
The public policies underlying the use of prior acts evidence predate Pa.R.E. 404 itself, as foreshadowed by Homewood People’s Bank v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:37 am by Jasmine Joseph
A Constitution for Everyone Bruce Ledewitz Duquesne University School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-20 Abstract Our Constitution is for everyone, but perhaps not in the way people assume. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Taylor Ross
In San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Court of Appeals had previously recognized an exception to the at-will doctrine in Wieder v. [read post]