Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Rhodes" Results 521 - 540 of 563
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
As we've pointed out, repeatedly, here, here, here, and here, most recent precedent has either rejected altogether the idea that uninjured people can recover prospective medical expenses, or else has limited such recoveries to environmental torts. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
This issue is often raised in college towns (see this table), and our Supreme Court has issued a ruling on it (Dvorak v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
That type of distinction was adopted by the Rhode Island Supreme Court in State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
Ormiston which held that Rhode Island courts did not have jurisdiction to hear a divorce case between two people of the same-sex because the state did not recognize the marriage. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
The Rhode Island Supreme Court faced an analogous question, at least as it construed the issue before it, in its recent ruling in Chambers v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Some people get the application of the learned intermediary rule mixed up with whether the defendant actually wins or not. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
As a result of that, and some litigation in the Massachusetts state courts, it seems that the only U.S. residents who have been allowed to marry in Massachusetts are Rhode Islanders (based on a possibly dubious interpretation of Rhode Island law by the Massachusetts courts) and a few New Yorkers who rushed in to marry in 2004 before state government threats to local clerks shut down that process. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
[The Rhode Island Supreme Court case cited in the briefs is State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:20 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]