Search for: "Thomas v. United States Department of Housing"
Results 521 - 540
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
United States is whether this emerging situation should lead the courts – ultimately, the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
Supreme Court, at least three concurring judges on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, a significant number of members of the House and Senate, along with the United Nations, Mexico (and many other states) and, of course, the International Court of Justice. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT SECURITIZATION The History of Financial Regulation in the United States What is Securitization? [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.) and Pedersen v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520; phone: 202-736-7000, FAX: 202-647-2835.) [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
Thomas v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/288773.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas, Scalia wrote: “With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are ‘contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Bush advanced the rights of a large segment of the citizens of the United States of America. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm
… This right shall be construed in conformity with the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
Thomas Porteous Jr., House votes to impeach federal judge from Louisiana. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Shaw for Amici Curiae Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicingon behalf of Real Parties in Interest.Wright, Finlay & Zak, Thomas Robert Finlay and Jennifer A. [read post]
