Search for: "Thomas v. United States Department of Housing "
Results 521 - 540
of 604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas, Scalia wrote: “With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are ‘contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Bush advanced the rights of a large segment of the citizens of the United States of America. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm
… This right shall be construed in conformity with the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
Thomas Porteous Jr., House votes to impeach federal judge from Louisiana. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Shaw for Amici Curiae Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicingon behalf of Real Parties in Interest.Wright, Finlay & Zak, Thomas Robert Finlay and Jennifer A. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
Thomas Fisher, Chicago, IL. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am
United States, a capital case in which the jury foreman made many calls to news organizations and two fellow jurors during the trial. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am
., the president of United States Sugar, and Shannon Estenoz, a board member of the South Florida Water Management District, on the banks of the Loxahatchee River in June 2008. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
In many respects, being on the Supreme Court is like being President of the United States. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
There remain three consistent votes in favor of state sovereign immunity: Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
