Search for: "U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
BRADLEY COUSINS,v.PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY.No. 1:16-CV-852-LY.United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
BRADLEY COUSINS,v.PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY.No. 1:16-CV-852-LY.United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
The complete brief can be downloaded from the American Bar Association's website. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:34 am
The settlement included a broad release of claims under California and federal law. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
District Court Justice Sam Cummings’ November 16, 2016 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
In 2023, a federal district court in Ohio joined the list of courts finding that disgorgement is uninsurable. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:14 pm
Sunnybrook Education Association, IEA-NEA, 1:23-cv-02804) filed in the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:34 am
In the PLIVA case, the court had ruled that federal laws barred generic manufacturers from altering warning labels on their products to differ from those on the brand name product. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:15 am
(In fact, the court noted that, since Morgan Drexen could not point to any inconvenience associated with litigating in California, the District Court properly “relieved it of litigating overlapping issues in two federal forums” and “fostered” judicial economy.) [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Justices also said they would rule on the duty of federal courts to defer to a contract agreement between the parties to have broad court review of any arbitration award (Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
Going forward, then, it ought to be clear that the Court has no tolerance for the ISLers’ claim that the “Elections Clause insulate[s] state legislatures from review by state courts for compliance with state law. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:36 am
I am hopeful that this issue will find its way into the federal courts so we can fully test these claims through an appellate process. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 1:53 pm
Suquamish Tribe (24-884) (Jurisdiction Over Nonmembers) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2025.html Waukegan Potawatomi Casino, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm
Far from being workarounds from the pro-arbitration mandate of the FAA, Armendariz and Gentry were examples of the California Supreme Court "following the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 1:56 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2025.html Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Consequently, the court barred the EEOC from seeking relief on behalf of the 67 allegedly aggrieved persons. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:48 am
Under Lujan and its progeny, federal courts [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 12:52 pm
On July 11, 2013, the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Court will decide whether federal courts are barred from second-guessing the federal EEOC’s attempts to resolve claims of discrimination in the workplace, before lawsuits are filed. ** In two cases, to be heard separately, the Court will seek to clarify how long an individual has to file a claim of wrongdoing with a federal agency under the Federal Tort… [read post]
