Search for: "U.S. v. Garcia*"
Results 521 - 540
of 790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:14 pm
The U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
But the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:34 am
The Court invited the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
We think there will be two, both from the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
While saying this is “under U.S. law” is unfortunate, given that this is a matter of state statute, and there is no such thing as “U.S. law,” it’s a fair generic explanation of the theory behind provocation. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
In addition to the states’ lawsuit, the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
Michael Semler weighs in on Liu v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
The case, Romagoza v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
NantKwest (Oct. 7): Whether an unsuccessful patent applicant who wants a federal district court to review the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:09 pm
Johnson, 2011 U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:10 am
Garcia, U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 6:24 am
Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155 (1978), or to make material omissions “that are designed to mislead, or that are made in reckless disregard of whether they would mislead, the magistrate,” United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
Parker, 2011 U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Garcia v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
The style of the case is, Araceli Medina Garcia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]