Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2020, 1:11 pm
Beyond the need for strict uniformity within the ranks of the Chinese Communist Party, the essence of the CPC's political work is grounded [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:32 am
Reeves, concluding that a dispute over legislative district maps in 2019 was moot. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:21 pm
” Even though there was no definitive ruling in the case – as the appeals court remanded the case for further proceedings – it is certainly one to watch, as there are very few cases where trade secrets claims are plead following instances of data scraping. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
Daley Center as follows: Removal of a pre-judgment case filed within a suburban municipal district shall occur by the sole action of the Respondent when the Respondent files an appearance, together with the District Transfer form” Cook County Court Rule 13.3(f)(i) This is really done as a convenience to the divorce lawyers. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held in Catlin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:05 am
The ruling in Martha Fulford, Administrator, Uniform Consumer Credit Code v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 8:46 am
The US District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied the motion, finding that Russomano was no longer bound by the non-compete provision because, by its terms, that provision expired twelve months after the termination of employment, which occurred on August 3, 2018. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[iv] Certain plaintiffs’ attorneys are regularly developing new and creative ways to increase filings and circumvent unfavorable regulations or court rulings. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:21 am
“If ever a problem cried out for a uniform and comprehensive solution,” wrote the district judge, it is the “geophysical problem” of climate change. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am
Like this case, that ruling was also in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:33 pm
Also, if the agency adopts rules now in order to block expression related to the protests, a Court could regard this as retaliation for free expression and an attempt to censor a certain viewpoint in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
The US Attorney for the District of Minnesota is responsible for that effort. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” The district court reasoned that the “public-nuisance claim raised issues relating to ‘interstate and intentional disputes implicating conflicting rights of States or . . . relations with foreign nations’ and that these issues had to be resolved pursuant to a uniform federal standard. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” The district court reasoned that the “public-nuisance claim raised issues relating to ‘interstate and intentional disputes implicating conflicting rights of States or . . . relations with foreign nations’ and that these issues had to be resolved pursuant to a uniform federal standard. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:42 am
The study committee will consider the need for one or more uniform laws addressing the special rules and procedures to mitigate the impact of an epidemic, pandemic, or other public health emergency on the operation of businesses. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:53 am
District Court for the Middle District of Florida issued a ruling on motions for summary judgment in 2019. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:07 am
The Court’s Ruling in the Case The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, dismissed the plaintiff’s action without prejudice and denied the remaining motions as moot. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:09 am
The period of suspension of legal deadlines ending June 5, 2020 is considered a legal holiday such that pleadings due that day are due within seven days of the resumption of normal court operations (June 12, 2020), except that expedited matters, such as cases governed by Uniform Riles- Courts of Appeal, Rule 5 will be due on or before June 8, 2020. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
Courts also have found that, in order for an event to qualify as force majeure under a catch-all, the event must have been unforeseeable. [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm
Supreme Court held that neither the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”) nor the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1997 modified the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) in a way that limited concurrent jurisdiction over Securities Act claims in state court or allowed removal to federal court of Securities Act cases filed in state court. [read post]
