Search for: "US v. Davis" Results 521 - 540 of 5,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 11:14 am by Karen Gullo
Weighing in on one of the most important digital privacy rights cases of the year, EFF is asking the court to hear arguments in Davis v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:09 pm
 Due Process probably requires us to at least try to notify them of the lawsuit. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: KELLY SUZANNE BRUSH, f/k/a KELLY SUZANNE DAVIS v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
 As the appellate court observed:Absent proof of the negligent application of wax or polish, the fact that a floor is slippery by reason of its smoothness or having been polished does not give rise to an inference of negligence ....Unfortunately, we're not able to wax poetic about these cases.For a copy of the Appellate Division's decisions, please use these links: Davies v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:20 am
The Court has ruled, in a 5-4 (right-left) vote, to invalidate the so-called Millionaire’s Amendment to McCain-Feingold that was at issue in Davis v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm by Michael C. Smith
This afternoon Judge Davis issued his rulings resolving the assorted postverdict motions in Clear With Computers v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
Maria Davies, The Use of Arbitration in Loan Agreements in International Project Finance: Opening Pandora’s Box or an Unexpected Panacea? [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:21 am by Walter Olson
If you think reopening a retail business with new distancing rules is a challenge, wait till you see the interplay with the ADA, as I explain in my new post at Cato; Court dismisses class action against Wendy’s on behalf of disabled persons unable to use after-hours drive-up service as a walk-up [Davis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
We affirm the denial of Malloy‘s motion to suppress under the authority of Davis v. [read post]