Search for: "US v. Peake" Results 521 - 540 of 866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Today the Supreme Court decided an interesting patent case in Brandt v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
The hearing  was held in the month of December which is a peak period and the hearing was convened on relatively short notice. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:56 pm by familoo
It’s one less responsibiliity for the lawyers, when so many new ones are being heaped on us every day. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:47 pm by Afro Leo
We do hope that you enjoy our content in 2014 and extend an invitation to anyone who wishes to be considered as a blogger or otherwise wishes to send us content for Afro-IP, to please write to us here.Afro Leo [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:57 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The strike peaked over the summer 2013, with 106 of 166 detainees striking. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:26 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.January 7, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Peak Financial Partners, Inc., Serial No. 85414941 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark PEAK & Design, shown below, for certain financial and real estate services, in view of the registered marks PEAK FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, INC. for certain financial services; PEAK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT for certain real estate services; PEAK PROPERTY… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:10 am by Colin Lachance
Monthly unique visitors are routinely over 230,000, a number that indicates extensive site use by individuals outside the legal profession. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This means that different results will be obtained dependent on the measurement conditions used. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Any rights in one’s name do not overcome a conflict with prior rights of another: “use of one's surname is not a ‘defense’ to a trademark infringement action” Sardi's Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:41 am by Tim Sitzmann
The facts here may or may not be sufficient to show a defense based on acquiescence (See  Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:39 pm by Matt Flyntz
  Searching for “civil rights” reveals that the term was not often used throughout much of U.S. history, but began to be used more in the 1940’s and 50’s until peaking after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the rise to prominence of Dr. [read post]