Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 11:03 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Moreover, this case further tilts the circuit split in favor of United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Schmidt v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
See the United States brief at 22-25. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
Indeed, the narrower a definition of imminence that we accept, the more this becomes a problem, since the time frame in which the government could simultaneously demonstrate that a target (1) poses such a threat to the United States; and (2) cannot be captured through less lethal measures [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
They attempted their coup without going to court first to assert their claims; they simply began using the names and the diocesan seal, both in their communications to clergy in South Carolina, and on the Web. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:16 pm
Appeals from there may be submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States, under seal. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am
"1. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am
Nor is it shared by the US national security leadership, whether under Bush, Obama, or whatever comes next. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm
Homeland SecurityThe investigation and arrest of Prokopi is an outgrowth of the civil forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:56 am
On February 1, 2011, Doe contacted Castro to retrieve the seized items. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 2:21 pm
Ill. 1993) (holding that the privacy interests of an individual whose conversations come under the power of another are implicated “even if the individual was assured no one would listen to his conversations, because the individual’s privacy interests are no longer autonomous”); see also United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am
http://bit.ly/NxatyI (Eric Johnson) Twitter Turns Over Wall Street Protester Posts Under Seal - http://bit.ly/SV0giY (Tiffany Katy) Under the Bonnet of Control Risks eDiscovery Engine - http://bit.ly/Nx8Xgh (Joanna Goodman) “We are in the World of eDiscovery 2.0… Now What? [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:13 am
A local rule in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia requires the party moving to seal documents to provide (1) a non-confidential description of the documents to be sealed; (2) a statement as to why sealing is necessary; (3) references to governing case law; and (4) a statement as to the period of time the party seeks to have the matter sealed and as to how the matter is to be handled upon unsealing. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 4:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
Here they are for those interested: 1) United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
Sadly, the United States also experimented with government-imposed racial labeling. [read post]
