Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers"
Results 521 - 540
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
Army Corps of Engineers - 4/10/15. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
Army Corps of Engineers - 4/10/15. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:06 am
In a blogpost yesterday, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and Assistant Secretary of the Army Jo-Ellen Darcy announced that their offices had sent a draft final version of what's been called the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule to the Office of Management and Budget on April 3. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
Army Corps of Engineers, where the Federal District Court of Idaho held that the government cannot prohibit firearms in tents on government-owned recreation areas. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 14-493, becomes the latest rescheduled case to underperform. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Wild Equity appealed, arguing that the incidental take statement does not become effective until the consulting agency – here, the Army Corps of Engineers – takes action by issuing the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) section 404 permit sought by San Francisco. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
All told, the federal government’s plan calls for mowing down more than half of East Sand Island’s cormorants—the largest colony of these birds in the western United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:56 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
This legislation (H.R. 872 in the 112th Congress and H.R. 935 in the 113th) would clarify Congressional intent regarding pesticide regulation in or near waters of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers 14-493Issue: (1) Whether a jurisdictional determination, that is conclusive as to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, and binding on all parties, is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act; and (2) whether a due process claim against an agency action is subject to the finality requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
United States (seven). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:00 am
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:13 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers 14-493Issue: (1) Whether a jurisdictional determination, that is conclusive as to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, and binding on all parties, is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act; and (2) whether a due process claim against an agency action is subject to the finality requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers 14-493Issue: (1) Whether a jurisdictional determination, that is conclusive as to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, and binding on all parties, is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act; and (2) whether a due process claim against an agency action is subject to the finality requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm
For its breach of contract claim, the SLFPA-E characterized some of the dredging permits at issue as “contracts” between defendants and the US Army Corps of Engineers to maintain and restore. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:20 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers 14-493Issue: (1) Whether a jurisdictional determination, that is conclusive as to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, and binding on all parties, is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act; and (2) whether a due process claim against an agency action is subject to the finality requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Army Corps of Engineers periodically flooded these acres, which adversely affected the peak timber growing season. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
The Sixth Circuit first laid out the law on the discretionary exception function, as defined by the Supreme Court in 1991 in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Outside groups have rallied opposition against the proposed rule, arguing that the proposed definition does not narrow the scope of the CWA but instead expands the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers authority under the CWA. [read post]
