Search for: "United States v. Brande"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 7:19 am
United States, Justice Thomas questioned his prior decision in Wyoming v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:14 pm
On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Thus, the FTC alleged, the company violated Section 5(a) of the FTC Act by making overly broad claims that certain branded products are “all or virtually all made in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am
The case in question was Fenty & Ors v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd, decided in the Court of Appeal in the early days of 2015, which dealt with the sale of a simple article of clothing; a t-shirt. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:23 am
September 17, 2020 - 2 PM: Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Thus, to market a generic drug, the manufacturer is "required to produce a drug that was equivalent to the brand-name drug and [is] not free to unilaterally pursue a safer alternative design in order to comply with state law." [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:20 am
In 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States released its opinion in the case National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:22 am
In Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:22 am
In Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:29 am
Today is rumoured to be National Bilski Day in the United States (if you've never heard of Bernard L. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 2:13 pm
In the landmark case Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
Although the reasoning is different, the result would be similar to that of the Lanza decision in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:17 pm
Williams v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted a defendant’s motion to decertify a class because plaintiff’s damages model was not consistent with his theory of liability as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
