Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2020, 4:03 am
Panetta was a lawsuit filed in 2012 challenging the targeted drone killings by the United States of three U.S. citizens in Yemen. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
And I was representing the United States as an amicus to Ohio, and I had not actually written the briefs in this case. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:13 pm
As Justice Stephen Breyer wrote on behalf of the Court: In our view, the Appointments Clause governs the appointments of all officers of the United States, including those located in Puerto Rico. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
United States is a 1977 Supreme Court case that addressed the proper standard for pornography convictions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
United States is a 1977 Supreme Court case that addressed the proper standard for pornography convictions. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
See Marks v United States ("When no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds"). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:19 am
For example, Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:41 am
On June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:39 pm
" United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
(That case, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
Gensetix argued that immunity should be limited to its text and applied only to cases “against one of the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:56 pm
Murphy was decided with a one-sentence per curiam opinion: "The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Consider the recent example of South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:07 am
The key case is Printz v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:44 am
Tying together these contributions is an exploration of the deepened inequities that characterize sexual and reproductive healthcare in the United States. [read post]
