Search for: "United States v. Cohen"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
United States, 350 F.3d 299, 306 (2d Cir. 2003); accord County of Erie, 546 F.3d at 229; see also Bilzerian, 926 F.2d at 1292; von Bulow, 828 F.2d at 103; Am. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am
According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 11:43 am
Pham, Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter DefenseHenri C. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:18 pm
(See, e.g., Cohen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm
Cohen and Gian Gentile argued that Russia’s military mobilization and recent annexation of Ukrainian territories gives clarity to the United States and its allies’ role in the war as a means to achieve total victory rather than attempting to negotiate settlements with Russia to bring peace to the region. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
” ** This option was set out in the initial collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the State as an employer and the Civil Service Employees Association with respect to employees in negotiating units represented by CSEA. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
” ** This option was set out in the initial collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the State as an employer and the Civil Service Employees Association with respect to employees in negotiating units represented by CSEA. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
To reach its conclusion, the BIA reasoned that the Eleventh Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
To reach its conclusion, the BIA reasoned that the Eleventh Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
The President’s own spokesman, Sean Spicer, has stated that the posts of the President on @realDonaldTrump should be “considered official statements by the President of the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Statements, Gun Seized During Arrest for Breach Of City's 'Open Container Law' Denied Suppression United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am
” Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic rounds up some additional commentary, and suggests that Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:52 pm
" Cohen v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:40 pm
See “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale” (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
