Search for: "United States v. Congress Construction Co." Results 521 - 540 of 690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Global credit crisis leads to boom times for legal process outsourcing businesses specialising in IP (Spicy IP)   Israel Israeli bakery Matzot Aviv files trade mark infringement suit against rival Patisserie Aviv and US importer Bagel Bites (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office relaxes conditions for modified examination (The IP Factor)   Italy Italian Supreme Court recognises ‘post sale confusion’ in criminal proceedings concerning sales of… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor)   Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
China should strengthen democracy and the construction of the legal system so that the country would be ruled according to the law. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs)   US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The event was co-sponsored by the Stanford Center for Racial Justice and the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
ZR 27/07 (EPLAW) Appeals Court: Düsseldorf: RapidShare doesn't need to filter user uploads (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)   India Tales from decrypt dept – guest post on s 65A Copyright Amendment Bill (Spicy IP)   Netherlands BREIN wants Usenet provider to start filtering (TorrentFreak) File-sharers are content industry’s ‘largest customers’ (Ars Technica)   United Kingdom Gmail settlement reached (Class 46)   United… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:The European call for copyright extension for performers: (John Carroll), (The IP Factor), (Spicy IP), (Public Knowledge), (IPR-Helpdesk), (Techdirt), (Innovationpartners),Full CAFC to reexamine the scope of subject matter patentability for business methods, also to consider whether it is appropriate to reconsider or overrule State Street Bank… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:12 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Take Justice Holmes’s explanation in Kalem Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Accordingly, any military action that relies solely on these “inherent” powers should be deemed to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, and should be sustained only if it falls within the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” sphere of authority (per Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
He said he proposed the amendment in reaction to the refusal by the FRBKC to provide Congress with any information about its decision to deny, then approve and then revoke a master acc [read post]