Search for: "United States v. Drew" Results 521 - 540 of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
  In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Joseph Scott Miller, United States Supreme Court Ip Cases, 1810-2019: Measuring & Mapping the Citation Networks, 69 Cath. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am by Aditya Bamzai
” That principle was at stake in Ortiz because the Supreme Court has also recognized (in an 1894 case called United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Responding to the invitation from the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General for the United States has filed an amicus brief for the United States in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USC Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am by SHG
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:05 am
A decision in 1939, United States v. [read post]
Federal law prohibits “depredation against any property of the United States” as well as robbing or attempting to rob “another of any kind or description of personal property belonging to the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
” The charter party separately requires CARCO to direct the Athos I to a “safe port” along the Atlantic seaboard of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
And as he narrates in volume one of Outside In, the starkest experiences of being an outsider came in his family’s transition to life in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
Representing the United States will be Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]