Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 521 - 540
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:51 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:10 pm
Bolchos v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm
In the Washington Post, former Bush Administration State Department Legal Advisor John Bellinger, argues that ATS lawsuits are being used to harass corporations into settlements, to interfere with other nation’s domestic affairs, and to embroil the United States in disputes with important foreign allies like the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Germany. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:43 am
In this case, the United States is on the other side. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:33 am
Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
Corporate Liability under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 - Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co.
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
Alverez-Machain was indicted in the United States for this crime. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm
The case is Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (2d Cir. 2010), in which Nigerian plaintiffs seek to hold Royal Dutch/Shell liable for violating the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm
United Kingdom, ECHR-Reports 2001-XI, p. 101, Kalegoropoulou v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:16 pm
The First Congress enacted the ATS as a species of foreign diversity jurisdiction to satisfy the United States’ obligation under international law to redress violence by U.S. citizens against foreign citizens. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:08 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
