Search for: "United States v. Jacobs"
Results 521 - 540
of 932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm
United States Town of Greece v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
In the role of moderator Sir Robin Jacob, who has been extremely busy during these two days. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:53 pm
United States is here. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Reply Brief Filed in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:10 am
Jacobs. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
In the second case, Kaley v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Vanessa Absher, Lynda Mitchell and United States of America v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
Anne returned to the United States on February 15, 2011. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:29 pm
Jacobs, 794 S.W.2d 14, 15-16 (Tex. 1990); Gustafson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
Another day, another chance for the United States Supreme Court to pork litigants with an arbitration ruling. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Romer v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
