Search for: "United States v. State of NY"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2020, 9:59 am
"] From A.W. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 5:33 pm
Up State Tower Co., LLC v Town of Kiatone, 2019 WL 6320335 (WDNY 11/26/2019) [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 9:26 am
These distinctions just scratch the surface and add to the complexity of the emerging patchwork of data privacy and security law in the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 9:26 am
These distinctions just scratch the surface and add to the complexity of the emerging patchwork of data privacy and security law in the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 10:11 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:39 pm
We as a nation are engaged in titanic struggles over the future of immigration in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 2:56 am
Yes, criminal lawyers will question the reason the NYPD or NY State Police stopped their client’s vehicle. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 65 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:19 am
Cornwall Warehousing, Inc. v Lerner 2019 NY Slip Op 02825 [171 AD3d 540] April 16, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in NYS Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:41 am
“The attorney-client privilege is the oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to the common law” (Upjohn Co. v United States, 449 US 383, 389; see Spectrum Sys. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:20 am
Tang v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 4:05 am
In Trombetta v Kruse, (NY Civ. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:47 am
The lower court summarily dismissed the petition and last week, in Sternlicht v Daniel Z. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
On the contrary, it provides that ‘[e]xcept when express provision therefor is made either in a statute of the United States or in these rules,’ the cost-shifting to the prevailing party otherwise applies to all cases. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm
Having recently qualified as a NY attorney, I have been asked how on earth – and why on earth – the royal couple would consider suing the press. [read post]
