Search for: "United States v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon"
Results 521 - 540
of 791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
Co., 2011 WL 6205903 (Dec. 8, 2011), in which a federal district court in Oregon declined to follow Amerigraphics. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:41 am
In a case with a complicated procedural history, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon recently held (pdf) that a claim for failure to consult under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) arises under the citizen suit provision of that Act rather than under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
Washington, United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
ANALYSIS The cornerstones of plaintiffs’ separation of powers challenge were laid in the mid-19th century when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
Lomax asked the District Court to order a United States Department of Defense investigation into his military service. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:40 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California entered judgment in Coalition for a Sustainable Delta and Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
” The court follows Fourth Circuit precedent (United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:54 am
(Case No. 3:12-cv-0063), the United States District Court for the District of Oregon last week tossed defamation claims against Facebook, Google and Lexis-Nexis arising from the plaintiff's dispute against the mother of his child and his former employer that involves a missing sex toy.Now that we have your attention, the litigious, unemployed, asset-free Gaston filed multiple lawsuits principally targeting Rivas, a former coworker at… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:48 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan agreed with Hosanna-Tabor that the ministerial exception barred the EEOC’s suit because the claims asserted concerned the employment relationship between a church and its minister. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
United States District Judge Lynn N. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:32 am
However, in a recent decision in the District of Oregon, Bobosky v. adidas AG, the court invalidated two trademark registrations because the applicant lacked the requisite bona fide intent to use the trademarks in commerce on all of the items set forth in his initial intent to use trademark applications. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
In a decision reaffirming directors’ authority to determine executive compensation, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has ruled that a suit against bank directors arising out of a negative “say on pay” vote should be dismissed. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Shute v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
— United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
He notes that “[a]s the parties point out, neither the United States Supreme Court nor the [U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
A court in Illinois has ruled that the US-based technology blog, TechnoBuffalo, does not qualifiy for state shield law and must disclose its source’s identity. “The decision against the consumer electronics blog TechnoBuffalo comes just one month after a federal district court in Oregon made a similar ruling regarding a Montana blogger, finding that she did not qualify as a journalist under Oregon’s reporter’s shield… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 pm
Now, as Broc Romanek reports, a federal district court has bounced one of these law suits: In a decision reaffirming directors' authority to determine executive compensation, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has ruled that a suit against bank directors arising out of a negative "say on pay" vote should be dismissed. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Federal Court Dismisses Umpqua Say-on-Pay Lawsuit Here's something that I recently blogged on CompensationStandards.com's "The Advisors' Blog": According to this memo from Wachtell Lipton: In a decision reaffirming directors' authority to determine executive compensation, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has ruled that a suit against bank directors arising out of a negative… [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:29 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
