Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re" Results 521 - 540 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
This can lead to motions to pseudonymize the parent as well, which are usually granted.[21] And sometimes maintaining pseudonymity may require redacting or sealing documents filed in court. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Haven’t we already had enough of cases captioned Johnson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:00 pm
In case you're interested in the bottom line, the data for legal academics is similar to the results of other studies: law professors give a lot more money to Democrats than to Republicans. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Macquarie’s motion to dismiss, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to plead an actionable misstatement or omission, a violation of Item 303, and scienter. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by Bexis
  Today we're thinking in terms of what the Court did, and how that affects what we do going forward.Initially, as we pointed out back when the Court first granted certiorari, both Brown and Nicastro were relative outliers. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The court rejected the insurer’s argument regarding “Direct means Direct” and criticized such legal interpretation:  “[t]he ‘direct means direct’ approach suffers the flaw of attempting to define a term through the very language requiring definition. . . . [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:19 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Changes include: Adding references to “new” Form 1024-A, Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code Clarifying that the IRS won’t rule on a request under IRC Section 501(c)(6) for an organization whose purpose relates to a controlled substance that is illegal under federal law Increasing user fees for certain miscellaneous determinations from $1,000 to $2,000 Changing the name of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel, Tax… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The Ninth Circuit recently granted re-hearing in the Model Mayhem case, where it originally endorsed a failure to warn theory as not being subject to Section 230. [read post]