Search for: "WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm
A few years too many for Oracle, which wants this resolved, but not for Google, which never went out of its way to accelerate anything here.On Monday afternoon local time, Judge William Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who once compared this case to the "World Series of IP cases", did the equivalent of a soccer referee blowing the whistle when the second half starts. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm
EFF Legal Fellow Jamie Williams will participate in oral argument in the case, Facebook v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
Williams, 2016 U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:35 am
By William W. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:57 am
Gateway Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:41 am
Okasaki v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm
(Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:47 pm
Edna Valley Watch v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm
William Simpson Constr. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
Kamen v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:14 pm
The purchaser alleged that every member of the class must have seen and relied on Buy.com's negligent misrepresentations that the rebate was available.The decision is Kershenbaum v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
California. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:48 am
Judge William H. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:38 pm
(Apple v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:04 am
“Critical habitat” where a species doesn’t live and can’t survive is subject of pending SCOTUS case [Ilya Shapiro and Meggan DeWitt on Cato brief in Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 10:36 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
Utah 1996).There's a little bit of bad law to beware of, especially a hideous recent decision out of California, Buell-Wilson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
