Search for: "WILLIAMSON v. STATE"
Results 521 - 540
of 970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2013, 4:19 am
In Williamson v Delsener (59 AD3d 291, 291), the Appellate Division, First Department, stated that "emails exchanged between counsel, which contained their printed names at the end, constitute signed writings (CPLR 2104) within the meaning of the statute of frauds. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm
Abbott Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:30 pm
In Save Panoche Valley et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:30 pm
County of Santa Cruz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
Williamson & Wilkins v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:53 am
United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
For example, In Skinner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm
In dicta in Lingle v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:41 pm
Supreme Court issued Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
In Leone v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
In Leone v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm
The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit's application of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
The entire parcel was subject to a contract with the county, governed by a state statute (the Williamson Act), that forbade residential development – even before the conservation easement donation had been made. [read post]
18 May 2013, 3:05 am
Williamson Cty. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
DIFFUSION AN INTERNATIONAL, INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COMPARATIVE LAW Co-Sponsored by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law and Juris Diversitas 3 & 4 June 2013 Lausanne, Switzerland [For additional information, contact Marie Papeil at marie.papeil@isdc-dfjp.unil.ch ] Monday, June 3, 2013 8:30-9:30 Registration, Coffee … [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:37 am
Last week, the US Supreme Court (sort of) decided Missouri v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:09 pm
sMounting bills Project 365(2) Day 142 (Photo credit: Keith Williamson) V is for Voluntary Disclosure. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
., Peterson v. [read post]
