Search for: "Wells v. Place" Results 521 - 540 of 31,820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
That is not a great place to be, but that's where we are.The post The Supreme Court's Grant in Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:07 am by Charles Sartain
Landowner and mineral owner (that includes you, lessee): Under ETC Texas Pipeline, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am by Guest Author
If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the Court, as well as the agency, must obey the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Eugene Volokh
For just some of the most famous literary examples, consider Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, Othello, and Julius Caesar, as well as the novels Anna Kare­ni­na, Madame Bovary, Les Miserables, The Catcher in the Rye, and The Great Gatsby. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:16 am by Courtney Finerty-Stelzner
On June 23, 2022, the United States Supreme Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
When detained non-citizens have brought habeas cases, the courts have generally limited their review to whether the detainee was, in fact, a non-citizen with the requisite connection — place of birth, citizenship, or residency — to the hostile nation or government. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
While the government has seized the Volga-Dnepr Airlines’ Antonov aircraft as well as a company that belongs to Russian oligarch, Roman Abramovich, the executive has not gone so far as to seize Russian central bank assets. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by CMS
  (1)       For the shipowner to have given up a valuable right of a contribution in General Average in relation to well-known kidnap and ransom risks requires a clear agreement to that effect – Gilbert-Ash (Northern) Ltd v Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd [1974] AC 689, 717 [read post]