Search for: "West v. Price" Results 521 - 540 of 964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2014, 8:36 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
  However, in this instance the purchase price is the highest offered for an American sports franchise and considerably higher than the other offers in the bidding or Forbes Magazine's estimate of the value of the team from January 2014. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Branding Extremes: Panda Cheese v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm by Colin O'Keefe
CLS Bank Undermines The USPTO Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance – Washington, DC lawyer Courtenay Brinckerhoff of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, PharmaPatents Securities Fraud Class Actions Survive Thanks to Stare Decisis -West Palm Beach attorney Dan Bushell on his blog, the Florida Appellate Review For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:46 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
 Unfortunately, the Appellate Court issued an unpublished opinion, Hubertus Investment Group v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Online games that result in coupons for e-cigarettes.Cheapness as lure: youth are notably price sensitive. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
  The issue up for debate was based on Ross River Dena v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:56 pm by familoo
I don’t see it much in my practice in the West Country. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
  In th case of Iran, the politics of its SWF is closely tied to its nuclear policies and economic relationships (including embargo politics) with the West. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]