Search for: "White v. Doe et al"
Results 521 - 534
of 534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
App. 1993); White v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Rettelle, et al. (06-605).The newly granted case in the Klein case tests whether firms that solicit or accept orders to trade on commodities exchanges -- that is, "futures commission merchants" -- have a right to sue for losses they incur when futures prices are manipulated illegally. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
It is not that Comey, et al., thought the President was powerless to overrule OLC -- they knew full well that he could. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
Today the Connecticut Supreme Court heard arguments from the parties in Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Patent No. 5,385,068 to White et al. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:11 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Ace Foster Care, et al v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
While Goldstein et al. aren't infallible, this does suggest that I have been looking at the world through olive-drab-colored glasses. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
Attorneys at will does not mean that any ground for removal is permissible. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:24 am
Fort, et al., 472 F.3d 1106, 1107 (9th Cir. 2007), Ord. denial of en banc available here. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Solomon introduced a bill that eventually became the Solomon Amendment [8], mandating, in part, that military recruiters not be denied access to campuses lest the entire university be cut off from funding derived from the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, et al. [9],[10]. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, White House Backs Away from Torture Memo (June 23, 2004)10. [read post]
31 Jul 2006, 8:04 am
Republican Party of Minnesota et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2006, 8:04 am
Republican Party of Minnesota et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
I am, however, excerpting below passages from an expert declaration on laws of war issues I prepared in the last Agent Orange litigation that addresses basic issues on jus in bello proportionality, the difficulties of criminal liability for alleged breaches of proportionality duties, and what the Yugoslavia tribunal prosecutor's office said - under Louise Arbour herself, if I recall correctly, although she joined the Supreme Court of Canada in 1999, so perhaps not - when it was raised as an… [read post]
