Search for: "Wife, P. v. Husband, P."
Results 521 - 540
of 703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
P. 56(c). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:48 pm
The husband and wife were married for 21 years before the husband filed for a divorce. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 12:21 pm
In the case of Whiteside v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
+v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:38 am
The plaintiff-ex-wife sought to increase the defendant-ex-husband’s child-support obligations. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.Dissolution of marriage -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court abused its discretion in denying wife's requests for attorney's fees and costs where husband has ability to pay and requiring wife to pay her own fees would result in diminution of her equitable distribution funds -- Equitable distribution -- Marital/nonmarital assets -- Trial court erred in finding that property acquired by limited… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
In Hicks v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:41 pm
Barnes, 231 Va. 39, 42, 340 S.E.2d 803, 804 (1986) (holding that when a husband and wife separate and employ attorneys, their former confidential and fiduciary relationship ends) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case? [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Mosley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
Only one South Carolina case discusses this issue, Widman v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:33 am
In Cummings v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
The Full Court referred with approval to the decision of the Master of the Rolls, Sir Thomas Bingham, in Ridehalgh v Horsefield (1994) 3 All ER 848 at 855 and said at p 82,365:Pursuant to s 117(2) Family Law Act, the court has jurisdiction to make an order for costs against a solicitor or a non-party. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
Thus, as counsel for the wife said, it is not readily apparent what the husband’s real needs are, and in any event, to use the words of Smithers J, “[t]his aspect of the case should be of moderate significance only” and “the outcome of the case should depend largely upon the extensive contributions of the parties over so many years”.Next, in addressing the husband’s submissions that the trial judge failed to adequately take into… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:03 am
The mistake being that of the lawyers and filing only one day out of time is of particular significance (see Jess v Scott and Others (1986) 70 ALR 185 a decision of the Federal Court particularly at p.189 to 191 where the solicitor in that matter was also out of time by one day).Without considering the merits of the appeal any more than is necessary for this application, it can be seen that to deprive the husband of an opportunity to appeal, where the filing was one day… [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:02 am
’ “ While wife asserted that the Court should consider the case of Nicholson v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Not in the case of Cuevas v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 9:16 am
The husband and wife had a marriage of short duration with no children. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:41 am
000+cod+20-107.3 Because wife did not share title and have joint interest in the property with husband, the wife could not claim the property as exempt under §34-4. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:16 am
Cases considered included: R v IAT, ex p Bakhtaur Singh [1986] 1 WLR 910; Soering v UK [1989] 11 EHRR 439; Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11; AS (Pakistan) v SSHD [2008] EWCA Civ 1118; EB (Kosovo) v SSHD [2008] UKHL 41; JO (Uganda) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 10]. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:38 pm
In Spreadbury v. [read post]
