Search for: "Wife B v. Husband B"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC., CERTIFIED GUNITE COMPANY D/B/A CUSTOM POOLS, AND JOHN M. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
Hughes v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
The film’scasting, its thematicdeployment of law as a source of restoring social order, and itsfinal scene—where husband and wife are separatedas the heroinebegins to serve her prison sentence—all deeply influenced Awāra. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
Muniz v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 10:14 am
(b) Issue: Was the husband entitled to deduct the amounts paid for the wife’s attorney’s fees as alimony? [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 10:08 am
Iglicki v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:00 pm
Since then the legislature has amended Section 111-b of the Domestic Relations Law authorizing the Surrogate's Court to determine paternity in the course of an adoption. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
(b) an incompetent. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
But one cannot, under penalty of criminal law, call this other person one’s wife or husband, or otherwise express that one is religiously or spiritually married to more than one person. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 2:07 pm
Writing at the time: As a cynic I note that the seven previous times our appellate courts rejected the continued cohabitation finding it was a husband trying to terminate an ex-wife’s alimony, while here it was a wife trying to terminate her ex-husband’s alimony. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:01 pm
AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC, Appellee. 4th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Timesharing -- Modification -- Concerns related to distance between former wife's residence and child's school not basis for modification where location of parties' respective residences was known at time of final judgment when trial court selected former husband's residence as child's legal address and address to be used for school designation purposes -- Because… [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In its August 19, 2015 decision in Hof v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
If he did, the outcome in the former wife’s case would be inconsistent with a deduction by the former husband. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
” State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:00 am
These proceedings had been brought by A (the husband) against B (the wife) before the District Court of Milan. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:41 am
In Gnall, the only issue raised on Appeal and in the Supreme Court had to do with the husband’s alimony obligation owed to the wife after their nearly fifteen (15) year marriage and therefore the issue was very specific and straightforward. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 3:06 pm
North Carolina General Statutes Section 50-20(b) (4) defines divisible property. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Approximately 75 minutes into the call, James Huff returned to his hotel room where his wife, Bertha Huff, awaited him. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:17 am
This couple never lived together, they were not financially dependent on one another and they never held themselves out as husband and wife. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
ONE PROGRESS PLAZA, II, LLC, Appellee. 2nd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Stock shares -- Valuation -- Trial court erred in setting value for shares of stock to be transferred from husband to wife without hearing parties' full evidence regarding value and, instead, setting the value at the average between value placed on stock by husband and value placed on stock by wife -- Remand for further proceedingsMICHELLE TUCKER,… [read post]
