Search for: "Williams v. Cover" Results 521 - 540 of 2,775
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm by Mark Graber
  In cases of sufficient prominence to be covered by the New York Times, Ginsburg was more likely to take a pro-business position than William Rehnquist. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Brandon Kirk Williams presented an opportunity for strengthening U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico “does not affect Williams’s precedent, as the facts of Gallagher are wholly distinguishable to the facts in the [Nationwide v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
In short, President Trump has led a wrecking crew (aided and abetted by William Barr and Mitch McConnell) that has severely damaged American legal norms of behavior. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Key flexibilities of the meal program had been due to expire later this month, including the provision that allows parents to pick up meals at any covered school rather than only the school that their child attends. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
They link their proposal to hypothetical EU debt issuance of 10 percent of EU GDP; the European Council recently adopted a borrowing plan of 5.4 percent of EU GDP.[8] Contrary to this recommendation, however, French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire panned the idea of bringing back the French wealth tax that was abandoned in 2018.[9] Additionally, Norway (although not an EU country for purposes of the Landais et al. proposal) recognized the need to adjust its wealth tax during the crisis.[10] The… [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John is a partner in the White & Williams law firm. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The result was that Ontario law was applied to this analysis.[11] On the question of unconscionability the Supreme Court followed its prior guidance that “arguments over any potential unfairness resulting from the enforcement of arbitration clauses contained in standard form contracts are better dealt with directly through the doctrine of unconscionability”.[12] The Supreme Court described the doctrine as follows:[13] Unconscionability is an equitable doctrine that is used to set aside… [read post]