Search for: "Yorker v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel suggests that next term’s Salman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
From People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:23 am
The Second Circuit smacked it down in Copeland v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:30 pm
In March, in Connick v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:08 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 2:11 pm
New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496, 517 (1991)). [read post]
Dangerous Knives and the Intent to Use Unlawfully Against Another: Further Review of NY PL 265.01(2)
14 Mar 2017, 6:16 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case, and Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
April 17, 2007); Magical Mile, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
Then, I thought that given the traditional deference shown to state courts on matters of state law, the SCOTUS wouldn't take the case. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:49 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bivens v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin observes that once Trump announces his nominee, “we’ll know within just a few hours whether there is any chance that the Senate will reject his choice,” “because the politics of Supreme Court appointments operates at the speed of the modern news media, not at the stately pace of the Justices’ deliberations. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:12 am
” Making things even more confusing, the Sponsor Memo appended to the bill states that the law “[v]oids current non-compete agreements and prohibits employers from seeking such agreement. [read post]
