Search for: "lynn" Results 521 - 540 of 9,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 10:56 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
On May 18, 2023, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of famed rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith against the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued its long-awaited ruling in the dispute between photographer Lynn Goldsmith and the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (AWFVA) on May 18, 2023. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am by Josh H. Escovedo
The decision affirms a previous ruling by the Second Circuit, which found that Warhol’s artwork shared the same commercial purpose as the original photograph taken by photographer Lynn Goldsmith. [read post]
23 May 2023, 3:56 pm by Karina Lytvynska
Please consider become a premium member or Buy Access Thank you Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email The post Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Hilde Lynn Helphenstein/ Jerry Gogosian appeared first on Center for Art Law. [read post]
23 May 2023, 3:56 pm by Karina Lytvynska
Please consider become a premium member or Buy Access Thank you Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email The post Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Hilde Lynn Helphenstein/ Jerry Gagosian appeared first on Center for Art Law. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:42 am by Corynne McSherry
These are the basic facts: In 1981, Newsweek commissioned Lynn Goldsmith to take a series of photos of Prince. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:48 am by musicandcopyright
US Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol Foundation in Prince silkscreen artwork fair use case The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of photographer Lynn Goldsmith in a long-running case with the Andy Warhol Foundation (AWF). [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
As others have noted, there is a "David and Goliath" quality to the ruling that photographer Lynn Goldsmith, breaking barriers as a woman in the male-dominated rock-n-roll photography field and earning a modest living from selling photographs to magazines for around $400, was entitled to compensation for Andy Warhol making an unauthorized tracing and silkscreen of... [read post]
23 May 2023, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Join us tomorrow at 2 pm eastern for the webcast – “Managing the New Buyback Disclosure Rules” – to hear Era Anagnosti of DLA Piper, Robert Evans of Locke Lord, Allison Handy of Perkins Coie, and Dave Lynn of Morrison Foerster and TheCorporateCounsel.net, address the new disclosure requirements and discuss their implications for public companies. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:09 pm by Samia Young
Last week, in a 7–2 decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court ruled that a 1984 work by artist Andy Warhol, portraying world-renowned singer Prince against an orange background (the “Orange Prince series”), infringed on the copyrights held by rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith. [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:38 am by Aaron Moss
Meanwhile, by the time the case reached the Court, photographer Lynn Goldsmith had limited her challenge to AWF’s act of licensing Warhol’s work to Condé Nast for use in a magazine commemorating Prince’s death. [read post]
20 May 2023, 3:27 am by SHG
Had Warhol not taken Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph and Warholized it, would Vanity Fair have wanted it, used it? [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:01 pm by Ronald Mann
Goldsmith provides a major statement in the role that copyright law plays in fostering artistic creativity, as the court upheld the claim of a famed celebrity photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, that the Andy Warhol estate infringed her copyright in a photograph of the musician Prince when it licensed an image Warhol derived from that photograph to serve as a cover on a Condé Nast issue published shortly after Prince’s death. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:30 am by Jessica Engler
When award-winning photographer Lynn Goldsmith snapped a portrait of the artist formerly known as Prince for Newsweek in 1981, she could not have predicted the cultural and legal impact the pop legend’s portrait would have. [read post]