Search for: "v. Atkins" Results 521 - 540 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2009, 4:16 am
There may be some exclusion cases akin to Atkins v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 27 March 2024 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in the case of Trump v Orbis. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
On 20 June 2024, the Supreme Court handed down judgement in the case of Mueen-Uddin v SSHD [2024] UKSC 21. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
The Court agreed that based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Atkins, Turner would be eligible for a second or successive petition if he could demonstrate that he was ineligible for the death penalty on account of Atkins’ holding that mentally retarded offenders should not be executed. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:49 pm
 For one view of the old terminology, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am by Russ Bensing
  Ten years ago, in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Kurtzman, Van Orden v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
Later on, the Court used the same approach to find that death is cruel and unusual punishment for mentally retarded offenders (Atkins v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Texas 14-989 Issue: (1) Whether a capital defendant’s intellectual function should be assessed at the time of the crime and trial, as Atkins v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:39 am
BiesCRIMINAL PRACTICE- Double Jeopardy - Insanity - Sentencing"The Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar a state court from conducting a full hearing on mental capacity under Atkins v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]