Search for: "BARRETT" Results 5381 - 5400 of 6,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Then in 2017, when Republicans controlled the Senate, they extended the simple-majority rule change to justices, too — and when Democrats wanted the filibuster to block the High Court nominations of Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett during the Trump administration, it was gone. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts announces the slightly surprising lineup that includes a concurrence by Jackson and a dissent by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, joined by Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The chief justice and the court’s newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett (who was not on the court for McGirt and may be a pivotal vote in this case), seemed intent on reading the GCA in a vacuum, pointing out that the statute does not affirmatively strip states of powers in Indian country. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As previously noted, Justice Jackson is also the most active justice at oral argument, and Justice Barrett is the only justice to have written a majority opinion in an argued case so far this term. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” In July, a Reuters analysis concluded that the Court’s emergency orders consistently favored religious groups and Trump’s administration.Findings like that may have contributed to Justice Amy Coney Barrett publicly declaring in September that “we’re not a bunch of partisan hacks. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by David M. Driesen
Justices Kavanaugh, Roberts, and Coney Barrett may understand some of this, for none of them signed on to the nondelegation doctrine theory. [read post]
7 May 2022, 3:51 am by SHG
There also includes the grievance of Merrick Garland’s and Amy Coney Barrett’s “stolen” seats (which makes sense only if one of the two seats was not stolen. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 7:36 am by Joseph Kearney
As the Seventh Circuit held last August, in an opinion by then Seventh Circuit Judge Amy Coney Barrett, this means that Illinois permits suits to enforce the public trust without a plaintiff's having suffered injury in fact, as is required by Article III for an action in federal court. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 10:26 am by Daniel Harawa
Disagreeing both with this use of legislative history and its accuracy, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett did not join this part of the opinion. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:23 am by Clifford Winston
In the aftermath of the rushed confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, some Democrats raised the possibility that they might attempt to "pack the court" to redress the philosophical imbalance, and they have recently introduced legislation to expand the Supreme Court by four justices. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am by Ronald Mann
” Similarly, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett all spent a considerable amount of time asking questions about potential remedies. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Barrett also wrote a dissent joined by the Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, save for the first sentence of her opinion ("I agree with the Court's analysis of the merits—but not with its decision to reach them. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 8:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh were never fully happy with Bruen in the first place. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Four other justices – Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson – indicated that they would have denied the RNC’s request in its entirety, keeping in place a ruling by a federal district court in Arizona blocking the state from enforcing the law. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 11:12 pm
Third, in promoting self-regulation, such immunity reconciles two seemingly conflicted goals: the need to limit the availability of objectionable content to minors and preserving the robust exchange of ideas enabled by the internet (see Law Professors' Amicus Brief, Barrett v Rosenthal, November 22, 2004). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Joelle Boxer
Despite these benefits, the film documents a quickly shifting legal landscape: the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the insurrection of January 6, 2021, and the Supreme Court’s reinstatement of the FDA’s in-person pill requirements on January 12, 2021. [read post]