Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 5381 - 5400
of 10,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm
United States in 2006]. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
United States (2003) 539 U.S. 166, finding them equally applicable here: Courts, however, must consider the facts of the individual case in evaluating the Government's interest . . . . [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Nigeria On 14 June 2023, Nigeria Data Protection Bill was signed into law. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Picard v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:35 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 2:26 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:59 am
Among other things, sixty-nine percent indicated that the Court “is a crucial governing body for the success of the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
United State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
The President then signed the bill into law. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/19/08-99005.pdf United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm
Either way, the South Korean bill doesn't help developers or consumers in the slightest as things stand.The South Korean parliament needs to amend its bill or Google will be laughing all the way to the bank.And there's a geopolitical issue here: South Korea is somewhat dependent on the United States (not just for military reasons). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Federal preemption of state tort claims BIC Pen Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
The complaint alleged violations of New York General Business Law § 349 (“Section 349”), the state consumer protection statute, based on two billing practices. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Paul followed up his primer by posting a letter signed by several former high-level national security officials to Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in opposition to the Senator’s proposals to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees to the United States. [read post]
