Search for: "John Doe, 4" Results 5381 - 5400 of 8,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am by slemberg
and (4) Must a mini-Miranda statement be used if the message is the initial contact with the consumer? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:37 am by Wells Bennett
Explaining the effect, if any, of this later development on the FOIA request here will require a further filing by the government. 4. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
Evidence of third-party copying of the design for a baking pan suggested an association between Hershey's design and consumer perceptions regarding chocolate bars.Considering all the evidence, the Board concluded that Hershey had established a prima facie case of acquired distinctiveness that the PTO failed to rebut.TTABlog comment: CAFC Judge Lynn, who dissented in In re Becton, would agree with the result in this case, although maybe not the Board's "weighing" of the elements… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
LEXIS 15036, at *3-4. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm by Ilya Somin
John Elwood offers a more elaborate discussion of some of the relevant issues. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 7:43 pm
There are things you can say about Alden — a case that certainly does outrage liberals — but "finest"? [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:39 pm by joel
John Does 1-15, Raw Films, a British adult film website, contended that 15 individuals in the Philadelphia area, identified only by their IP addresses, violated federal copyright law by reproducing the pornographic movie “Bareback Street Gang. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 4:43 am
Image: Chief Justice John Roberts - public domain as work of U.S. government. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
(Does any justice write solo opinions less often than the Chief?) [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:23 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-5, a bittorrent download case pending in Manhattan before Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, John Doe #4 has filed a motion to quash the subpoena, and for severance and dismissal.Notice of MotionMemorandum of LawAffidavit of Morlan Ty RogersDeclaration of John Doe #4 Commentary & discussion:Slashdot var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
While most of our work at QuestionCopyright.org addresses artists and audiences, we're also always on the lookout for good pieces intended for the legal and policy research communities. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:35 am by Jessica Webb-Ayer
In a decision that surprised many analysts, the Court upheld the law in a 5-4 opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:10 am by Gustavo Arballo
Roberts: Petracchi´s way Dando el voto decisivo de la sección principal de un fallo 5-4, el juez John Roberts (presidente o "Chief Justice" de la Corte, designado por Bush) encontró una forma elegante de salir de la encrucijada que nos recuerda mucho al voto de Petracchi en "Camps", el caso del 22 de junio de 1987 en el que nuestra Corte Suprema validó la ley de obediencia debida (en un trámite sí que rápido: la… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:48 pm
The vote of Chief Justice Roberts saved most of the Act, 5-4, and limited (by the same margin, 5-4) the one part of the Act he did not like. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:33 pm by Guest Author
Sebelius addressing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”).1 The Court upheld, in a 5 to 4 ruling, the constitutionality of the individual mandate under the ACA. [read post]