Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 5381 - 5400 of 6,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
After Thomas-Rasset’s first trial in 2007, in which Davis declared a mistrial because of an error in a jury instruction, the judge noted that the original verdict of $222,000 for the same 24 songs was ridiculous but nevertheless suggested Congress should change the law. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:22 am
Compared with the dry, mannerly prose found in many opinions, Judge Fletcher's passion in Cooper v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:20 am
Compared with the dry, mannerly prose found in many opinions, Judge Fletcher's passion in Cooper v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:59 am
Termination for disrespectful conduct dual constitutes disqualifying misconduct for the purposes of claiming unemployment insurance benefitsMatter of Davis v Commissioner of Labor, 2009 NY Slip Op 05922, decided on July 23, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentDeborah Davis worked as a school district secretary for approximately 2 ½ years. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
  The court answers no to both, and there’s case law, if not an abundance of logic, on its side. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) BPAI uses dictionary published six years after filing date in rejecting claims: Ex Parte Davis (Gray on Claims) BPAI rejects claims, finding PHOSITA would have to make speculative assumptions concerning the meaning of claim language: Ex parte Brune (Gray on Claims) ITC reverses Remand Initial Determination and finds no violation in investigation relating to coolants brought by INEOS against Sinochem (ITC 337 Law Blog)… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
Davis, 905 F.2d at 249 n.2 (citation omitted).Rather, compliance with international law is necessary but not sufficient. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:14 am
"L'affaire Mathesius has entered the realm of law reviews. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
(EDITOR’S UPDATE: The recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]